The key concepts of thermochemistry were introduced today and will be explored over the next week.
Tuesday, 26 May 2015
Thursday, 21 May 2015
Thursday, 14 May 2015
Molecule Polarity
This was just an introduction to polarity. We will be exploring this more in the next lesson.
Our task was to determine the polarity of the molecules we did ball-and-stick diagrams for in yesterday's lesson.
Here are a couple of observations we need to be able to explain, using molecular polarity:
Our task was to determine the polarity of the molecules we did ball-and-stick diagrams for in yesterday's lesson.
Here are a couple of observations we need to be able to explain, using molecular polarity:
- Polar solutes dissolve better in polar solvents. Non-polar solutes are only sparingly soluble in polar solvents. Why? The example we were given was ammonia (NH3) dissolving in water.
SOURCE: UC Davis ChemWiki - Polar molecules have higher melting and boiling points than non-polar molecules with a similar-sized electron cloud. For example, methane (MR = 16.0 gmol-1) is a gas at room temperature while water (MR = 18.0 gmol-1) is a liquid. Why?
SOURCE: http://chemsite.lsrhs.net/bonding/lewis_dots.html
| SOURCE: http://www.ausetute.com.au/lewisstr.html |
Tuesday, 12 May 2015
VSEPR Theory and Shapes
In Level 2 Chemistry, we only worry about molecules with a maximum of four regions of electron density (bonds and/or lone pairs of electrons) around the central atom.
Our task today was based around p p127-8 in Beginning Chemistry, but we used marshmallows, lollies and toothpicks to model the molecules, instead :)
NOTE: Error at 8:30. Tetrahedral bond angles are 109.5°, not 107°.
However, the bond angle in water is indeed around 107° due to the increased
repulsion caused by the two lone pairs of electrons.
Our task today was based around p p127-8 in Beginning Chemistry, but we used marshmallows, lollies and toothpicks to model the molecules, instead :)
Thursday, 7 May 2015
Lewis Dot (Electron) Diagrams
The book explains these very well, but uses a slightly different method for working them out than shown here:
They are most useful for showing the covalent bonding in molecules:
We will spend the next lesson working through examples, including those in our homework on Moodle.
They are most useful for showing the covalent bonding in molecules:
We will spend the next lesson working through examples, including those in our homework on Moodle.
Tuesday, 5 May 2015
Electronegativity and Substance Type
Ionic compounds have ionic bonds between the ions. Molecular compounds and elements have covalent bonds between the atoms (but inter-molecular forces between the molecules). How do we know if the bonds are covalent or ionic?
We use the electronegativity difference between the atoms involved in the bond.
Sometimes, the electronegativity difference is unexpected and does not match the physical properties, such as electrical conductivity or melting point. In these cases, we need to justify our choice (ionic or covalent bond; ionic or molecular substance) based upon all of the evidence we have.
We are not always given electronegativity values in an assessment. Therefore. we need to understand the trend in electronegativity (on the Periodic Table), so we can infer electronegativity difference in a compound:
We use the electronegativity difference between the atoms involved in the bond.
![]() |
| SOURCE: http://images.tutorcircle.com/cms/images/44/electronegativity-of-elements.png |
Friday, 1 May 2015
NCEA Question - Solids
We struggled a bit with the homework tasks over the holidays, so had to do the following question in 15 minutes in class today:
If we struggled, the following video has been made available for us, explaining how to answer the questions:
NOTE: The video did not capture the entire screen, so some of the text is missing.
The full answers can be seen in our class OneNote.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

